ch <tim.irn...@ericsson.com>; Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com>;
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing
> installer dependent information in the test tools
>
> IMO, the log collection topic is a CI
ich <tim.irn...@ericsson.com>; Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com>;
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing
installer dependent information in the test tools
IMO, the log collection topic is a CI/Releng function rather th
;>>
>>> + Mingjiang Li (Rex) Mobile: +86 13761275017
>>> + Shanghai Institute, Huawei
>>> + No. 2222, Xinjinqiao Road, Pudong, Shanghai, 201206, P.R.China
>>> +---+
>>>
&
g Kunz
抄送: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
主题: Re:
[opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn]
Proposal for removing installer dependent
information in the test
: Friday, October 13, 2017 4:28 AM
> To: Tim Irnich <tim.irn...@ericsson.com>
> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing
> installer dependent information in the test tools
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> M
lt;mailto:jack.mor...@intel.com>>
Cc:
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing
installer dependent information in the test tools
Hi,
When it comes to log collection, I strongl
-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing
installer dependent information in the test tools
Thanks everyone for your inputs.
So if Yardstick based approach is the preferred one, then I am thinking of
ext
v.org
> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Jose Lausuch
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 09:16
> To: xudan (N) <xuda...@huawei.com>; Morgan, Jack <jack.mor...@intel.com>
> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tec
ts.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing
installer dependent information in the test tools
Hi,
When it comes to log collection, I strongly believe it should be done post-job
in our CI pipeline, not as part of the test case. Users can always collect lo
;
> From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] On Behalf Of Jose Lausuch
> Sent: Wednesday, Octobe
5 AM
To: Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing
installer dependent information in the test tools
Hi,
I would vote for having something similar to Yardstick [1] but centralized
.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] On Behalf Of Jose Lausuch
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 4:40 PM
> To: Beierl, Mark <mark.bei...@dell.com <mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>>
> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-t
-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Jose Lausuch
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 4:40 PM
To: Beierl, Mark <mark.bei...@dell.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing
installer dependent information in the test
13 matches
Mail list logo
