I’ll take a look this week. Thanks, Christian for giving it some care.
As a background, tinybundles (idea, name and implementation) was result of a
single night with lots of Whisky in 2009 or so. That maybe explains things but
also gives you a hint that you are free to “improve” ;)
On 19. Aug 201
+1
And I can review your changes end of next week (I take some time off ;)).
Regards
JB
On 19/08/2018 13:49, Christian Schneider wrote:
> I recently worked on base and tinybundles.
> On base the main change is to make sure store does not leave files and
> directories behind.
> I also removed th
After the release of Tinybundles I wonder if we could remove the dependency
to base store.
The dependency seems innocuous at first but the problem is that base store
is provided as a full base bundle in OSGi. So when you currently deploy
tinybundles in OSGi you are quite tightly coupled to pax exa
I recently worked on base and tinybundles.
On base the main change is to make sure store does not leave files and
directories behind.
I also removed the dependency to base-io so store now does not have any
dependencies besides the slf4j-api.
For tinybundles I removed the file that was written when
