Please Ignore. The problem was in the bundle Imports. No need for
systemPackages.
Cheers,
Dutch.
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 8:59:11 PM UTC-5, Dutch Dude wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This seems like a simple problem, but I am banging my head agains the wall
> for two days now and I can't figure
Hi,
This seems like a simple problem, but I am banging my head agains the wall
for two days now and I can't figure it out.
I am trying to write an integration test with commons-email, which depends
on javax.activation...
systemPackages("javax.activation", "com.sun.*"),
...
czw., 17 sty 2019 o 14:35 Jérémie Brébec
napisał(a):
> Thanks !
>
> By the way, the features processors you introduced in Karaf 4.2 is helping
> me a lot with this kind of patch :-)
>
I'm glad it's useful ;)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> Le jeudi 17 janvier 2019 14:32:12 UTC+1, Grzegorz
Thanks !
By the way, the features processors you introduced in Karaf 4.2 is helping
me a lot with this kind of patch :-)
Le jeudi 17 janvier 2019 14:32:12 UTC+1, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit :
>
> Hi
>
> I reviewed PAXWEB-1119 and understood it. CMPN R7 Http Whiteboard spec
> (chapter 140) doesn't
Hi
I reviewed PAXWEB-1119 and understood it. CMPN R7 Http Whiteboard spec
(chapter 140) doesn't say anything about websockets. So I'm fine with
forcing users to register WebSockets with "(websocket=true)" flag. If
websocket endpoint can be (thank you very much JavaEE! - or maybe OSGi
should add
Hello
Achim - any reason why this was not merged? Something's missing?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 17 sty 2019 o 13:36 Jérémie Brébec
napisał(a):
> I reopen (again) an old thread : Is there a plan to merge PAXWEB-1119 into
> master/7.2.x ? I have to cherry pick the patch/rebuild paxweb on
I reopen (again) an old thread : Is there a plan to merge PAXWEB-1119 into
master/7.2.x ? I have to cherry pick the patch/rebuild paxweb on every
upgrade.
Le mardi 8 août 2017 08:24:24 UTC+2, Achim Nierbeck a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> yes you're right using a non official osgi flag isn't good.
>
