Okay I have checked this and it does not seems a real option. With a
custom cunstructor wen can't use standard ServcieLoader but must
implement our own, and we can't declare checked exceptions in a nice way.
Beside this, at least the Karaf-Container does some magic in its
Factory, so I think we should stick with this (for now).
> So what do you think? How about having a hangout some time?
What exactly do you have in mind?
Am 14.08.2017 14:24, schrieb Toni Menzel:
We may want to have a community call for this. Pax Exam would benefit
from losing some fat, in terms of: dependencies, API width,
complexity, legacy etc. I found adding new capabilities quite hard
because things where expanded without evolving the API itself.
So what do you think? How about having a hangout some time?
--
--
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
