Hi Dietrich,
Yeah, it's a pretty old blog post ;) I think it makes sense to add or
extend the Karaf examples.
I will do it.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On 30/11/2019 10:25, Dietrich Schulten wrote:
> Exactly. Those spring and activemq versions were a bit painful indeed :)
>
> Btw your old blog code is
Exactly. Those spring and activemq versions were a bit painful indeed :)
Btw your old blog code is running again
https://github.com/dschulten/blog-camel-blueprint/tree/karaf4-paxexam4. Care
for a PR to your blog sample after 4.2.8 is out?
Best,
Dietrich
--
--
--
OPS4J -
Hi Dietrich
Just a small note: I did cleanups/improvements on KarafTestSupport in
Karaf 4.2.8-SNAPSHOT. It's easier to use now. So I would advice to use
KarafTestSupport from Karaf 4.2.8-SNAPSHOT (I'm preparing Karaf 4.2.8
anyway ;) ).
Regards
JB
On 29/11/2019 12:03, Dietrich Schulten wrote:
>
Hi,
thank you very much, I was already wondering if CamelTestSupport is still a
good fit for Pax Karaf Tests. You gave a clear opinion here :)
I see you have built your test upon KarafTestSupport and I was already able
to get that to work in my environment, so that looks most promising.
I'll
Hi,
CamelTestSupport is for utest whereas pax-exam is more for itest.
You can take a look on some itest I did about Camel, for instance:
https://github.com/apache/karaf-decanter/pull/111/files#diff-f23addf50c34ea79c8df17bb2861d649
So, you should *NOT* use CamelTestSupport for itest (and keep
