Re: Migration of OPS4J projects from Jira to Github

rzybek > > > > wt., 9 lut 2021 o 12:51 Grzegorz Grzybek > napisał(a): > > > >> Hello > >> > >> I'd like to let you know that I've migrated these projects from OPS4J > Jira > >> to Github: > >> - PAX TRANSX: > >> > https://g

Re: Migration of OPS4J projects from Jira to Github

Hello > > I'd like to let you know that I've migrated these projects from OPS4J Jira > to Github: > - PAX TRANSX: > https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.transx/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aall > - PAX JMS: > https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.jms/issues?q=is%3Aiss

Migration of OPS4J projects from Jira to Github

Hello I'd like to let you know that I've migrated these projects from OPS4J Jira to Github: - PAX TRANSX: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.transx/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aall - PAX JMS: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.jms/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aall - PAX JDBC: https://github.com

Re: Migration from Jira to Github issues

ps4j.tools/tree/master/jira2github> > [3]: https://github.com/grgrzybek/test2github/issues > <https://github.com/grgrzybek/test2github/issues> > [4]: https://gist.github.com/jonmagic/5282384165e0f86ef105 > <https://gist.github.com/jonmagic/5282384165e0f86ef105> > [5]: >

Re: Migration from Jira to Github issues

thub> [3]: https://github.com/grgrzybek/test2github/issues <https://github.com/grgrzybek/test2github/issues> [4]: https://gist.github.com/jonmagic/5282384165e0f86ef105 <https://gist.github.com/jonmagic/5282384165e0f86ef105> [5]: https://spring.io/blog/2019/01/15/spring-framework-s-

Migration from Jira to Github issues

ng.io/blog/2019/01/15/spring-framework-s-migration-from-jira-to-github-issues -- -- -- OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and s

Re: Jira or github?

On Monday, April 27, 2020 9:15:16 AM CEST 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J wrote: > Hi, > > in the past we needed to do a "lock-down" on self-registration for the Jira > Instance due to tremendous amount of spam in Jira Issues and on the > confluence pages. > This increases the burden for people to

Re: Jira or github?

+1 to change to github. We need some rules though to be able to mark issues as fixed in a certain release. (I think it can be done with tags on the issues). Christian Am Mo., 27. Apr. 2020 um 09:15 Uhr schrieb 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J < ops4j@googlegroups.com>: > Hi, > > in the past we needed

Re: Jira or github?

It make sense to use Github for all. +1 regards, *François Papon* *papon...@gmail.com * Le lun. 27 avr. 2020 à 10:12, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J < ops4j@googlegroups.com> a écrit : > +1 from me as we essentilally haven't used the real power of jira over > the past years and it was a

Re: Jira or github?

+1 from me as we essentilally haven't used the real power of jira over the past years and it was a little bit brittle to register for two services Am 27.04.20 um 09:57 schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek: +1 - especially for commit-issue references! -- -- -- OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org

Re: Jira or github?

+1 - especially for commit-issue references! But how about Atlassian ↔ Ops4J agreement? (was there any?) regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 27 kwi 2020 o 09:36 Jean-Baptiste Onofré < jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > +1 to use github tools. > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at

Re: Jira or github?

+1 to use github tools. Regards JB On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 9:15 AM 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J < ops4j@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi, > > in the past we needed to do a "lock-down" on self-registration for the > Jira Instance due to tremendous amount of spam in Jira Issues and on the > confluence

Jira or github?

Hi, in the past we needed to do a "lock-down" on self-registration for the Jira Instance due to tremendous amount of spam in Jira Issues and on the confluence pages. This increases the burden for people to file new Issues :( How about changing to github completely for issues and documentation?