[OPSAWG] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.

[OPSAWG] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to htt

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

Robert, thanks for your review. Eliot, thanks for addressing Robert’s comments. I have entered a Yes ballot. Alissa > On Apr 12, 2018, at 8:17 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > > Hi Robert and everyone else, > > Circling for a landing here... > > On 11.04.18 18:15, Robert Sparks wrote: >> With this, I

[OPSAWG] Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ie

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-?? overview of significant changes over the last year

On Apr 18, 2018, at 2:49 PM, Andrej Ota wrote: > > TACACS+ draft had undergone a number of changes since revision -06 back in > the February 2017 and we, the "collective of authors" have been less than > satisfactory on keeping the WG updated. This is an attempt to start fixing > the problem b

[OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-?? overview of significant changes over the last year

Hi Everyone, TACACS+ draft had undergone a number of changes since revision -06 back in the February 2017 and we, the "collective of authors" have been less than satisfactory on keeping the WG updated. This is an attempt to start fixing the problem by going through changes, enumerating them an

[OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-??: 9.1. General Security of The Protocol

Hi Everyone, This covers section 9.1. exclusively. I'm compiling list of changes for other sections changed since the -06 revision while you have a chance to review this section. New text in -07: > 9.1. Overall Security of The Protocol > > TACACS+ protocol does not include a security mechani

[OPSAWG] Mirja Kühlewind's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.

[OPSAWG] Mirja Kühlewind's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.

Re: [OPSAWG] R: Notification of the new draft of "Coordinated Address Space Management architecture"

Hi, Giuseppe Thank you for your comments. We fully agree with you to add the use case of integration CASM system with SDN architecture, I think it is a very pratical one in telecom network. The draft will be revised based on the comments in IETF 101 OPSAW WG meeting and the use case you ment

[OPSAWG] R: Notification of the new draft of "Coordinated Address Space Management architecture"

Hi Chongfeng, I have read this draft. I think the architectural concepts and components that are introduced here allows a good coordination for the address space management. I would suggest to add an Use Cases section where it is possible to specify better how CASM system integrates with a Networ

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-10.txt

Hi the Authors, I remember you posted a list of Alan's comments in the mailing list, and mentioned what have been addressed and how, what will be addressed later. I think it's a good start. Why not continue doing this for your new revision. It would be very helpful. Tianran > -Original Mes