Hi Tim, Robert,
Thanks a lot for your comments. Regarding the idea of using BGP-LS for
troubleshooting, we have also considered the possible pros and cons.
BGP-LS is initially proposed for carrying link state information using BGP, and
is currently used for applications like topology visualizat
Hi Greg, Jeff, Acee, Robert Wilton, Einar,
and anyone who has concern with NMP vs. gRPC/YANG, thanks for your interest in
our draft and your valuable comments. Regarding this question, we’d like to
state the following two points.
1. Control plane (CP) and management plane (MP) information
> On 10 Jul 2018, at 22:38, Joe Clarke wrote:
>
>>
>> Let us (authors) take this recent feedback on board and reword things
>> along the lines:
>> - Use MUST where we want programmers to do the right thing, but be
>> careful not to distort the actual protocol as currently implemented.
>> Han
> But I guess we all agree that this is not the best use of BGP protocol to
> be now a vehicle of NMS only because it is easy with BGP to establish a TCP
> session and to distribute "stuff" in a relatively loop free fashion.
now that dns over tcp/tls is being deployed, we can return to the other
o
Tim,
I already suggested use of BGP-LS *as-is* in this thread on Jul 6th.
But I guess we all agree that this is not the best use of BGP protocol to
be now a vehicle of NMS only because it is easy with BGP to establish a TCP
session and to distribute "stuff" in a relatively loop free fashion.
Thx