Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09

2019-12-10 Thread 진재환/팀장
Dear all, I support this draft for WG adoption.I believe this document povides a solution to solving operation issues that are difficult to manage. This draft is a way to solve the problem of no alarms(traffic forwarding issue) in network. Best regards,Jaehwan │ E-Mail : daena...@lguplus.co.kr

Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09

2019-12-10 Thread daniel
Hi All, I reviewed the document a few revisions ago and posted my thoughts on the list. The authors have done a good job to address my comments, and also the issues highlighted before and during IETF 106. The document is not perfect and will need further work. I feel it is suitable in

Re: [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09

2019-12-10 Thread Haoyu Song
Hi Alex, Thank you very much for your support and detailed review. We'll consider your suggestions in the next revision. They'll definitely help improve the quality of the draft. Best regards, Haoyu -Original Message- From: Alexander L Clemm Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 9:42 AM

[OPSAWG] Comments on draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09

2019-12-10 Thread Alexander L Clemm
Hi Haoyu, Draft Authors, after reading draft-song-ifit-framework-09, whose adoption I support, FWIW I have a few comments that I think should be addressed in future revisions of the draft: Section 1, 2nd paragraph: line of argumentation why "radical rethinking of existing methods" needs to