Speaking as WG member:
With respect to your use case for transit router advertisement… What I was
unsuccessfully trying to articulate to you during the interim was that the
management system will typically not know the exact path between two endpoints
so the use case is flawed. In fact, many
Speaking as WG member:
Hi Tianran,
The more I look, the less I like this. We have a YANG infra-structure for
telemetry data using YANG pub/sub. It is being implement and deployed over both
NETCONF and proprietary transports. Why would we want to take just this type of
telemetry out and handle
On Apr 7, 2020, at 13:58, Warren Kumari
mailto:war...@kumari.net>> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:06 AM tom petch
mailto:ie...@btconnect.com>> wrote:
From: Warren Kumari mailto:war...@kumari.net>>
Sent: 06 April 2020 16:07
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:36 AM tom petch
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:06 AM tom petch wrote:
>
> From: Warren Kumari
> Sent: 06 April 2020 16:07
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:36 AM tom petch wrote:
> >
>
> Warren,
> understanding better what you have in mind, I suggest a few changes to the
> Abstract and Introduction, as below. My
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : Secure Device Install
Authors : Warren Kumari
Colin
> On Apr 7, 2020, at 07:57, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Just FYI:
>
> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-107-opsawg
> https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/notes-ietf-107-opsawg
> These are *not* the same etherpad. The second one is the supported one.
>
>
From: OPSAWG on behalf of Michael Richardson
Sent: 06 April 2020 19:07
Tom, please quote better.
>
> Warren, thanks for that., I sort of guessed the first but not the
> second. For the second, do you get TFTP over a newly laid fibre? I
> was thinking not based on what I
Hi Acee,
About the “IFIT specific information channel”, as in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit/
we propose to use bgp enabled sr-policy for IFIT auto deployment.
It’s reasonable to incorporate both traffic engineering and monitoring.
Thanks,
Tianran
发件人: Acee
