[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-00.txt

2021-01-26 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : Operational Considerations for use of DNS in IoT devices Author : Michael Ric

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-00.txt

2021-01-26 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : Authorized update to MUD URLs Authors : Michael Richardson

Re: [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG adoption call on draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-03

2021-01-26 Thread Michael Richardson
Henk Birkholz wrote: > thanks! On second thought, why not use > draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-00 instead :o) I have uploaded draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-00. Please note that J.Yang is no longer with the Huawei Technologies standards group and won't be able to contribut

Re: [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG adoption call on draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-03

2021-01-26 Thread Michael Richardson
Henk Birkholz wrote: > this email concludes the call for Working Group Adoption on > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03. > We received a reasonable number of positive replies, no objections, and > a set of comments. > The chair

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

2021-01-26 Thread Randy Bush
> I have requested additional directorate reviews for this work so we > have a good amount of eyes on it. thank you! randy ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

2021-01-26 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
As a contributor: I have read -01, seen my previous comments addressed, and I overall I think this is ready to progress. As a chair: I have requested additional directorate reviews for this work so we have a good amount of eyes on it. Joe On 1/22/21 16:44, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote: > Happy n

Re: [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG adoption call on draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-03

2021-01-26 Thread Henk Birkholz
Hi Tom, thanks! On second thought, why not use draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-00 instead :o) Viele Grüße, Henk On 26.01.21 17:53, tom petch wrote: From: OPSAWG on behalf of Henk Birkholz Sent: 26 January 2021 15:26 Dear OPSAWG members, this email concludes the call for Working G

Re: [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG adoption call on draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-03

2021-01-26 Thread tom petch
From: OPSAWG on behalf of Henk Birkholz Sent: 26 January 2021 15:26 Dear OPSAWG members, this email concludes the call for Working Group Adoption on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03. We received a reasonable number of positive replies, no objec

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-00.txt

2021-01-26 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : Discovering And Accessing Software Bills of Materials Authors : Eliot Lear

Re: [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG adoption call on draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-03

2021-01-26 Thread Henk Birkholz
Dear OPSAWG members, this email concludes the call for Working Group Adoption on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03. We received a reasonable number of positive replies, no objections, and a set of comments. The chairs believe this I-D is ready

Re: [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG Adoption Call on draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03

2021-01-26 Thread Henk Birkholz
Dear OPSAWG members, this email concludes the call for Working Group Adoption on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03. We received a reasonable number of positive replies, no objections, and some significant comments. The chairs believe this I-D

Re: [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG Adoption Call on draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00

2021-01-26 Thread Henk Birkholz
Hi Eliot, if you don't mind, I'd prefer a simple rename for -00 followed by an -01 that addresses the comments from Wei. Looking at Wei's input, I agree that the result should be rather non-controversial (and can be further addressed in the working group proceedings, if the need arises - I'll

Re: [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG Adoption Call on draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00

2021-01-26 Thread Eliot Lear
Hi Henk, I’ve made a handful of changes in the source to address the comments of Wei Pan. Would you mind if I post that and allow for the possibility that we will back them out if necessary (I think they are non-controversial). Eliot > On 26 Jan 2021, at 14:03, Henk Birkholz > wrote: > > D

Re: [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG Adoption Call on draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00

2021-01-26 Thread Henk Birkholz
Dear OPSAWG members, this email concludes the call for Working Group Adoption on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00. We received a reasonable number of positive replies, no objections, and various significant comments. The chairs believe this I-D is ready for adopt