On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:13:52AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> Russ wrote:
> > Responding to Part 1 of your DISCUSS and a few of your comments. My
> > co-authors will address the other parts, including the NITS.
>
> turning attention to this now. i was in the RIPE meetings getting this
> through
I'll try to respond to the thread in reverse order to avoid duplication...
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:11:51PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> ok, let me try to cover what russ has not. good reviews are much
> appreciated
>
> [ in the cs academic social circle, there has been comment that,
>
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : Finding and Using Geofeed Data
Authors : Randy Bush
ok, let me try to cover what russ has not. good reviews are much
appreciated
[ in the cs academic social circle, there has been comment that,
though reviews can be a pita, they are substantial revwiews. one
gets useful feedback. in man other fields, one gets one or two
sentences
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:36:52PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> ever see the cat herding video?
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://archive.psg.com/cat-herders.mov__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!UwP65THoPAKtaE74N5YFw9MSNO17zkgu96E4xctycM7-Iu1KDATEZf22uke20g$
> >
> > Does not render. Oh well, I’ve seen cat
>> ever see the cat herding video?
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://archive.psg.com/cat-herders.mov__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!UwP65THoPAKtaE74N5YFw9MSNO17zkgu96E4xctycM7-Iu1KDATEZf22uke20g$
>
> Does not render. Oh well, I’ve seen cat videos before, I’ll use my
> imagination.
i suspect your corporate
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Hi Randy,
Further replies below. I’ve snipped where I had nothing further to say; please
consider me to have chuckled at your bons mots, thanked you for updates, etc.
> On May 19, 2021, at 11:00 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
[…]
>> 1. Section 3:
>>
>> Ideally, RPSL would be augmented to define a
Roman:
Responding to just one comment.
> ** Appendix A. The end-user certificate has a sbgp-ipAddBlock field which is
> “IPv4: inherit IPv6: inherit”. However, the parent CA is encoding an IPv4
> only
> range so it seems misplaced that there is a IPv6 reference there.
>
> See
> Responding to Part 1 of your DISCUSS and a few of your comments. My
> co-authors will address the other parts, including the NITS.
turning attention to this now. i was in the RIPE meetings getting this
through their sausage machine.
> OLD:
>
>1. Obtain the signer's certificate from an
Ben:
Responding to Part 1 of your DISCUSS and a few of your comments. My co-authors
will address the other parts, including the NITS.
> --
> DISCUSS:
> --
>
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:34 AM Randy Bush wrote:
> > I may have missed something, but why does Section 5 advocate for use
> > of HTTPS to fetch geofeed files in the second paragraph, and then FTP
> > in the seventh?
>
> the former is for getting one file through direct reference. the latter
>
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
One quick reply, more pending —
To be clear, that was me thanking George for a job well done. I didn’t intend
to imply the authors hadn’t provided credit where due, I did see that you had,
and thanks for that.
—John
> On May 19, 2021, at 11:01 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> 0. I’d like to
> I may have missed something, but why does Section 5 advocate for use
> of HTTPS to fetch geofeed files in the second paragraph, and then FTP
> in the seventh?
the former is for getting one file through direct reference. the latter
is bulk transfer of the totality of the repository's data
15 matches
Mail list logo
