Hi Med,
[Just to also close this thread/review.]
I think that you are good to go.
Thanks for accommodating my comments.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
>
> Sent: 13 July 2021 16:17
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-
>
Hi Med,
I think that you are good to go.
Thanks for accommodating my comments.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
>
> Sent: 13 July 2021 17:04
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-
> l3nm@ietf.org
> Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject:
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheeers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com]
> Envoyé : mardi 13 juillet 2021 17:55
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ;
> draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org
> Cc : opsawg@ietf.org
> Objet : RE: AD review of
Hi Med,
Looking at the diff, I think that you have a typo for "oubound".
But just to check, the "inbound-rate-limit" and "inbound-bandwidth" both act in
the same direction, right? That was the consistency that I was striving for.
Normally, when I think of a QoS policy as acting on say a PE
Hi Moti,
Thank you for catching this.
Fixed at:
https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/commit/ead6781ad73229cae267f6d805d9dcc19b8824a0
Cheers,
Med
De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Moti Morgenstern
Envoyé : mardi 13 juillet 2021 17:11
À :
Re-,
I updated the file to take into account your feedback:
* Module:
https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/commit/fcc9f6c1e79d5074469fe454d95770fe9f1becdb
(in addition to the changes already reported as part of the L3NM review).
* I-D: https://tinyurl.com/vpn-common-latest
Unless you have
Hi,
I noticed that the enumerated values supposed to be under "identity
evpn-service-type" actually use "base evpn-redundancy-mode".
Regards,
Moti Morgenstern
Packet Optical Networks - Systems Architecture
30 Hasivim Street | Petah Tikva, Israel
office: +972.3.9266258 | mobile: +972.50.705.6258
Ho Rob,
I updated the files to take into account your feedback:
* Fix input/output in the common I-D (diff):
https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/commit/ff456448a9398311457eb51c1d78adc8210fd8f8
* L3NM (diff):
Hi Med,
Please see inline, just a couple of points to resolve ...
> -Original Message-
> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
>
> Sent: 12 July 2021 18:35
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-
> common@ietf.org
> Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: AD review of
Hi Med,
Thanks for the quick reply.
A few comments inline ...
> -Original Message-
> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
>
> Sent: 12 July 2021 18:57
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-
> l3nm@ietf.org
> Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: AD review of
10 matches
Mail list logo