Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 05:19:00AM +, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> > I'm not sure that draft-hegde-spring-mpls-seamless-sr is at a state of
> > maturity to be a good reference here (and thus, that this example is worth
> > including).
> I agree. The only a
-Message d'origine-
>> De : Joe Clarke (jclarke) [mailto:jcla...@cisco.com]
>> Envoyé : vendredi 10 septembre 2021 15:36
>> À : Oscar González de Dios ;
>> BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; opsawg-
>> cha...@ietf.org
>> Cc : opsawg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-l...@ietf.org
>> Objet : Re: [OPSAW
Title: Response to LS on work progress on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD)
network in SG13
Submission Date: 2021-09-10
URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1757/
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?=
To: gm...@kaist.ac.kr,tsbs...@itu.int
Cc: The IAB Executive Director ,S
Thanks Med for confirming that all IETF LC comments have been resolved. I've
issued the IESG ballot, it should be on the telechat in approx. 2 week's time.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
>
> Sent: 10 September 2021 08:14
> To: opsawg@ietf.org; R
Thanks Med for confirming that all IETF LC comments have been resolved. I've
issued the IESG ballot, it should be on the telechat in approx. 2 week's time.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
>
> Sent: 10 September 2021 08:07
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilto
Hi Joe,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Joe Clarke (jclarke) [mailto:jcla...@cisco.com]
> Envoyé : vendredi 10 septembre 2021 15:36
> À : Oscar González de Dios ;
> BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; opsawg-
> cha...@ietf.org
> Cc : opsawg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-o
I meant responses to some of my comments. I didn't see
references/definitions added for LAG and LACP (or ARP or ND).
You still have "Active" and "Backup" in Figure 36 for precedence type
where I think it should be Primary and Backup. Plus, in Section 6.7,
you refer to Primary and Secondary. Whe
Hi Joe,
I reviewed Med proposal and was good with it. No further points from my
side for the l2nm.
Oscar
-Mensaje original-
De: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Enviado el: viernes, 10 de septiembre de 2021 15:16
Para: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
CC: opsawg
I completely missed the follow-up, which I'm now reading. Thanks for
addressing some of these comments. I like the boolean approach to the
PW MTU.
I didn't see Oscar's follow-up on some of the other points, though. I
assume that's still pending?
Joe
On 9/10/21 03:02, mohamed.boucad...@orange.
Thanks for the update, Thorsten. It seems like your plan is to get this
in just under the 112 wire so it can be presented?
Joe
On 9/10/21 08:05, Thorsten Dahm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> apologies for the long silence, we just wanted to check in with an
> update on the TACACS+ (with TLS) draft. The aut
Hello,
apologies for the long silence, we just wanted to check in with an
update on the TACACS+ (with TLS) draft. The authors are still working on
the document, and we do expect to have the text ready in around ~5 weeks
from now and hope for a lot of feedback from the group.
Thanks,
Thorsten
Hi Rob, all,
This version integrates the IETF LC comments. Detailed replies for each review
were already sent to the list.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de internet-
> dra...@ietf.org
> Envoyé : vendredi 10 septembre 2021 0
Hi Rob, all,
This version integrates the IETF LC comments, mainly those revived from
directorate reviewers. Detailed replies for each review were already sent to
the list.
We are ready for the IESG review.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf
Hi Chairs, all,
This version integrates the comments received from Joe and Julian (as indicated
in another message sent to the list).
Chairs, can you please issue a WGLC for this version? Thank you.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De l
14 matches
Mail list logo