Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-11.txt

This revision https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-11 addresses YANGDOCTOR review comments from *Xufeng.* *-Tiru* On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 20:22, wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of

[OPSAWG] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph,

[OPSAWG] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

[OPSAWG] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph,

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-11.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) (D)TLS Profiles for IoT Devices Authors

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-09

Dan, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Nov 14, 2022, at 21:36, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09

Hi Rob, Thanks for the follow-up. After rereading the initial proposed updated text, I think that you have a valid point about the need for more clarity when describing the relationship between the various status data nodes. I released -11 with an attempt to make that better. Both the data

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-11.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : A YANG Network Model for Service Attachment Points (SAPs) Authors : Mohamed

Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (YANG Modules for Service Assurance) to Proposed Standard

On 28/11/2022 12:28, Jean Quilbeuf wrote: Hi Tom, Thanks for your comments, we tried to address them (see below). The diff of the changes is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10 I think that this still has some quirks. In several

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph,

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-11 [RESEND]

Paul, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Nov 18, 2022, at 16:55, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > [Resending to include the wg and last-call.] > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART)

[OPSAWG] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10

Reviewer: Bo Wu Review result: Ready I reviewed version-09 and this version-10 has addressed my comments. One minor issue: the current version of the YANG file revision-date is not updated, e.g. ietf-service-assurance-dev...@2022-04-07.yang, which can be fixed when released.

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Dear WG, I have read the draft and support moving this work toward publication. It is relevant as it specifies new IPFIX Information Elements necessary for the export of SRv6-related information and the management of an SRv6 network. Best Regards Paolo From: OPSAWG

Re: [OPSAWG] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-10

Thanks Xufeng for the detailed review. Please see inline On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 05:56, Xufeng Liu via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Xufeng Liu > Review result: Ready with Issues > > This is a review of the YANG module in draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-10. > > Sec 5.1. and 5.2 > > 1) The container