Hi,
I have looked at the changes and they seem fine, I could not find any
major problems except for the file revisions not matching the YANG
revisions, for all the modules, so please remember to fix that when you
do the next update.
file"ietf-service-assura...@2022-04-07.yang"
...
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph,
Bonjour Jean,
Thanks for your detailed reply. I agree with all the points in the email
*including* the ones about the blocking DISCUSS, i.e., I will clear my DISCUSS
ballot once a revised I-D is posted.
For additional discussion, look for EV> below.
Bien à toi
-éric
On 15/12/2022, 01:54,
Hi Roman,
Thanks for your review,
You will find our answer below.
Best,
Jean
> -Original Message-
> From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Wednesday 14 December 2022 14:28
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architect...@ietf.org;
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your comment.
No new draft revision yet, but you’ll find below answers to discuss and
comment, including modification that we plan to do.
Michal Vaško did the early YANG doctor review. Since there are modifications
planned to the YANG module in this mail, I added him in
I support publication. The IETF 115 hackathon is a great data point on
development of interoperability of implementations.
Thanks
Gyan
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 8:54 AM Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote:
> Hello, WG. As discussed at IETF 115, we want to conduct a WG LC for
>
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Hi Eric,
On 12/12/2022 2:07 PM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker wrote:
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Hi,
I support progressing to the next stage with this document. As expressed
before, it addresses interesting aspects for IPFIX, already demonstrated in
practice.
Be goode,
--
“Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno”
Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
https://www.linkedin.com/dr2lopez/
11 matches
Mail list logo
