> OPSAWG on behalf of Henk Birkholz
> writes:
> Not Ready
That wasn't the question Tom. This is not a WGLC. This is a WG adoption call.
by replying, I think you have indicated that you are interested in the WG
taking on this work?
> The linktype I-D is defective with its
> On 29. Dec 2022, at 17:45, tom petch wrote:
>
> From: Carsten Bormann
> Sent: 29 December 2022 13:20
>
> On 2022-12-29, at 12:55, tom petch wrote:
>>
>> The linktype I-D is defective with its documentary references so the
>> website is going to be as well. The number of references for
From: Carsten Bormann
Sent: 29 December 2022 13:20
On 2022-12-29, at 12:55, tom petch wrote:
>
> The linktype I-D is defective with its documentary references so the
> website is going to be as well. The number of references for links is
> considerable in the I-D although none appear as
On 2022-12-29, at 12:55, tom petch wrote:
>
> The linktype I-D is defective with its documentary references so the
> website is going to be as well. The number of references for links is
> considerable in the I-D although none appear as references of the I-D as
> anyone familiar with the
From: OPSAWG on behalf of Henk Birkholz
Sent: 08 December 2022 20:34
Dear OPSAWG members,
this starts a Working Group Adoption call for a bundle of two documents:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-05.html
>
> On 29. Dec 2022, at 12:18, Henk Birkholz
> wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
> Hi Michael,
> hi all,
>
> thanks for your help!
>
> As I am continuously challenged by reading my own calendar properly, replies
> for this Working Group Call for Adoption may drizzle in until Monday (and
> then some, as I am
Hi Tom,
Hi Michael,
hi all,
thanks for your help!
As I am continuously challenged by reading my own calendar properly,
replies for this Working Group Call for Adoption may drizzle in until
Monday (and then some, as I am not sure how many folks will look at this
on Jan 1st). In essence, we
Dear OPSAWG,
I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
Regards, Benoit
On 12/22/2022 3:55 AM, Tianran Zhou wrote:
Hi Authors and Contributors,
Accompany with the WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and
contributors to confirm on the list.
Please respond if you are
