Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

2023-01-12 Thread Marco.Tollini1
Dear OPSAWG, I have reviewed this draft and support it. On-path delay is becoming more relevant, and having it exposed through a well-standardized and diffused protocol as IPFIX is the right approach. Best regards, Marco From: Tianran Zhou Date: Thursday, 22 December 2022 at 03:25 To:

Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

2023-01-12 Thread Thomas.Graf
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/?q=draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01 Danke! Angekommen  Sorry für den Stress. Lg Thomas On 13 Jan 2023, at 07:16, Buchs Yannick, INI-NET-VNC-HCS wrote:  Dear OPSAWG, I strongly support the adoption of

Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

2023-01-12 Thread Yannick.Buchs
Dear OPSAWG, I strongly support the adoption of draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01. It addresses an important topic which is export of on-path delay metrics through IPFIX, which is a mature and widely used standard. Best Regards Yannick From: Tianran Zhou

Re: [OPSAWG] [ippm] 回复: FW: WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

2023-01-12 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Tianran, Thanks for mentioning three standardized protocols that contribute to world diversity: ISIS, OSPF and IPFIX. Paolo On 12/1/23 03:41, Tianran Zhou wrote: Hi Zhenqiang and Thomas, Thanks very much for sharing your experience and the discussion in the mailing list. IMO,

Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

2023-01-12 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi, I support adoption of draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01 and intend to validate and implement the data collection in pmacct. Paolo On 21/12/22 23:25, Tianran Zhou wrote: Hi WG, This mail starts a WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01.

Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

2023-01-12 Thread MORTON JR., AL
Hi OPSAWG, I reviewed this draft on the IPPM-List a few months back, and I support its adoption by the opsawg. Al On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 6:26 PM Tianran Zhou mailto:40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: Hi WG, This mail starts a WG Adoption Call for

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-06.txt

2023-01-12 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : Authorized update to MUD URLs Authors : Michael Richardson

Re: [OPSAWG] [dnsdir] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-07

2023-01-12 Thread Ralf Weber
Moin! On 11 Jan 2023, at 14:35, mohamed.boucadair--- via dnsdir wrote: >> I see this draft as ready with the following nits: >> - The table of attributes under 7 Table of attributes only have >> two values which both start with 0. As the main distinction is >> that attributes MUST NOT appear when

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-12

2023-01-12 Thread Eliot Lear
Ok, this is now posted as -13. On 06.01.23 16:28, Eliot Lear wrote: Hi Rob, On 19.12.22 17:25, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: Hi Eliot, Scott, Thanks for this document.  Here is my AD review for draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-12. Moderate level comments: (1) p 3, sec 1.  Introduction    

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-13.txt

2023-01-12 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : Discovering and Retrieving Software Transparency and Vulnerability Information

Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

2023-01-12 Thread Alex Huang Feng
Dear OPSAWG, Of course, as a co-author of the draft, I support the WG adoption. I do think we need this new information elements in IPFIX. I also would like to inform that I am working on an implementation in the open-source project Fd.io VPP of this draft using Trace-type IOAM

Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

2023-01-12 Thread Severin Dellsperger
Hi all, I support this WG Adoption Call. I'm convinced it helps us to do an honorable step in the future of modern network monitoring and analytics. Best Regards, Severin Dellsperger From: OPSAWG on behalf of Tianran Zhou Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022