Hi,
I just saw draft-united-tvr-schedule-yang posted.
Please be aware that OPSAWG is working on YANG modules for scheduling as
well.
draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl was just recently adopted, but the Wg has
determined that the scheduling aspects should be generalised and pulled out
into a separate
Hi Éric,
Updated the name in my local copy.
I'm not sure to get your question. Can you please clarify? Thanks.
Cheers,
Med
De : Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Envoyé : mercredi 11 octobre 2023 18:06
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : Re: Length of EHs RE: About
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review.
I agree having an example is useful to avoid that bit offset is interpreted as
bit value.
We do having the following in the introduction to basically say that we are
echoing what is in RFC9293 about the meaning of offet:
Also, Section 6 of [RFC9293]
Hello Med
Indeed, I was not clear enough, what matters it the length of the extension
headers chain not individual headers length.
Suggestion to s/ipv6ExtensionHeadersAggrLength/ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength/
to make it clear.
Now, what is the source of the IE ? The OS with a static value ?
Hi Med, WG,
Here is my AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc7125-update-03.
Moderate level comments:
(1) p 3, sec 3. The tcpControlBits Information Element
If exported as a single octet with reduced-size encoding, this
Information Element covers the low-order octet of this field
