Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-03.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG
of the IETF.
Title: Extended TCP Options and IPv6 Extension Headers IPFIX Information
Elements
Authors: Mohamed Boucadair
Hi Chairs,
Now that the content was moved to a separate draft
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang/) and that
draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl has a normative dependency on that new I-D, can we
please consider issuing an adoption call for it?
Thank you
Cheers,
Med
De :
Hi, all,
Some high-level updates of -01:
* Change the document title and add a reference to "policy"
* Split the definition of schedule YANG module into a separate document
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang/)
* Add reference to I-D.
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-01.txt is now available. It is a work
item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the
IETF.
Title: A YANG Data Model and RADIUS Extension for Policy-based Network
Access Control
Authors: Qiufang Ma
Qin Wu
Hi Joe,
Yes, I confirm. See Slide # 7 of [1] (TEAS#117) or [2] (TEAS#116).
Cheers,
Med
[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/117/materials/slides-117-teas-attachment-circuits-updates-next-steps-00
[2]
I recall that Med has either presented some of this work or discussed it with
TEAS in the past, but would be good to get as many comments on this work as
possible. Opsawg is currently in an adoption process for the four drafts below
until next Monday. Thus far, sentiment has been positive on
Thanks, Oscar. I saw the “teas” field in the name and recall (maybe in error)
that Med had said he had presented to or informed that WG of this effort. If I
am mis-remembering, I will forward this adoption call there for the last ~week.
Joe
From: Oscar González de Dios
Date: Tuesday,
Eric,
On 10/6/2023 4:19 PM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Re-,
Your comment about “unknown L4” reminded me another comment you had
about how to disambiguate unknown EH vs. upper layer headers:
Our local copy includes now the following NEW text:
If an implementation determines
Hi 6man,
FWIW, the following specification is being developed in OPSWAG:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh/
Comments to the extension headers part of the spec are welcome.
Cheers,
Med
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-02.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG
of the IETF.
Title: Extended TCP Options and IPv6 Extension Headers IPFIX Information
Elements
Authors: Mohamed Boucadair
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-03.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG
of the IETF.
Title: Export of UDP Options Information in IP Flow Information Export
(IPFIX)
Authors: Mohamed Boucadair
Hi Joe, all,
These drafts complement the work that was started with the LxNM models
and the Service attachment points. It provides a much necessary glue to the
ongoing efforts on slicing. Hence (also as co-author of the document) I support
the adoption of the drafts.
I
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-03.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of
the IETF.
Title: Simple Fixes to the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) IANA Registry
Authors: Mohamed Boucadair
Benoit
13 matches
Mail list logo
