Dear Greg,
Thank you for your interest in our draft, and the associated extensive
comments! All welcome!
*CMP: Please find some additional follow-ups.*
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 7:52 PM Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> thank you for your kind consideration of my notes. Please find my
> follow-u
On 1/16/2024 11:10 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Are you expecting the implementation to have an exhaustive list of all
of the ExIDs in use to understand the difference between 2 and 4 byte
usage?
*/[Med] Yes because otherwise an implem can’t unambiguously identify
and extract ExI
I’d actually like to suggest this doc avoid repeating information in other
docs, notably the UDP options spec.
In particular:
- there is no need to replicate Fig 1
- there is no need to replicate the definitions of SAFE or UNSAFE
All these things can be “as defined in X”. That avoids any issues
Hi Wes,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Wesley Eddy
Envoyé : mardi 16 janvier 2024 16:09
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; tsv-...@ietf.org
Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : Re: Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-05
The chan
The changes look good to me; I just want to make sure you understand one
of my questions that doesn't look like it was clear enough:
On 1/15/2024 4:13 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
- The way an implementation understands the TCP ExIDs may benefit
from slightly more explanation:
--
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-06.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG
of the IETF.
Title: Export of UDP Options Information in IP Flow Information Export
(IPFIX)
Authors: Mohamed Boucadair
Ti
Hi Joe,
Thanks for the follow-up.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : to...@strayalpha.com
Envoyé : lundi 15 janvier 2024 17:17
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
Cc : int-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix@ietf.org;
opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf
Hi Tommy,
Thanks for clarifying. You have a valid point.
Updated the type to point to unsigned256, which is now defined in
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Tommy Pauly
> Envoyé : lundi 15 janvier 2024 15:06
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET