Re: [OPSAWG] Submission of new version of TACACS+ TLS Spec (V4)

2024-01-25 Thread Douglas Gash (dcmgash)
Hi, Thanks for your further review. We will check through your comments against the latest version and identify the missing items, then continue this thread on what their acceptable resolution could be. Thanks, The Authors. From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com Date: Thursday, 25 January 2024

Re: [OPSAWG] Submission of new version of TACACS+ TLS Spec (V4)

2024-01-25 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Authors, all, Many thanks for your effort on this document. I managed finally to read the new version. I'm afraid that some of the comments in https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-03-rev%20Med.pdf were not addressed or at least I fail

Re: [OPSAWG] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-04

2024-01-25 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Martin, Thank you for the follow-up. Fixed the nits in the yang file. Also updated the module to make use of the new groupings for referencing purposes instead of the broken typedefs in the ac-ntw:

Re: [OPSAWG] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-04

2024-01-25 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Martin, Thanks for the review. Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Martin Björklund via Datatracker > Envoyé : mercredi 24 janvier 2024 16:20 > À : yang-doct...@ietf.org > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit@ietf.org; > opsawg@ietf.org > Objet