> Q1: There are a few places where the document says "Currently". I'd
> prefer to instead say something like "At the time of publishing this
> document". I do realize this issue already exists in RFC 9092.
sure. thanks.
randy
___
OPSAWG mailing list
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Hi Qin,
> The rules here are intended to be with respect to packet loss reporting
> requirements rather than auto-mitigation actions. Could you call out a
> specific example which is confusing?
> [Qin Wu] No strong opinion here, just feel the term 'rule' and 'requirement'
> are interchangeable
