On Jan 26, 2024, at 3:53 PM, Tim Hollebeek
wrote:
>
> Yes, that's the correct paragraph I was referring to.
>
> Unfortunately, RFC 2119 does actually imply that these words can't
> be used in non-2119 ways:
>
> "In many standards track documents several words are used to signify
> the
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
the comments, responses and proposals are inline.
>
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Ben Campbell <b...@nostrum.com> wrote:
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 9:08 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
> wrote:
>
> -2.2.1: Please expand "QUIC" and add a citation.
>
> QUIC started out as an acronym (and went through two or three variations),
> but sometime during the chartering process, the expansion was
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer