[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-13: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: (with COMMENT)

2023-04-24 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-03

2023-04-24 Thread Lars Eggert
Russ, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 14. Dec 2021, at 00:02, Russ Housley via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area

Re: [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-12: (with COMMENT)

2023-03-01 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, On Mar 1, 2023, at 20:30, Kenneth Vaughn wrote: >> No reference entries found for these items, which were mentioned in the text: >> `[RFC3413]`, `[RFC2579]`, `[RFC3411]`, `[RFC2578]`, and `[RFC2580]`. > All of these references are part of either STD58 or STD62, both of which are > listed

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-11

2023-02-28 Thread Lars Eggert
Joel, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Feb 10, 2023, at 01:56, Joel Halpern via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-12: (with COMMENT)

2023-02-28 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [OPSAWG] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12

2023-01-13 Thread Lars Eggert
Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Jan 3, 2023, at 22:11, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-13: (with COMMENT)

2023-01-13 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-09

2022-12-12 Thread Lars Eggert
Dan, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Nov 14, 2022, at 21:36, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-11 [RESEND]

2022-12-12 Thread Lars Eggert
Paul, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Nov 18, 2022, at 16:55, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > [Resending to include the wg and last-call.] > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART)

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-12

2022-10-20 Thread Lars Eggert
Elwyn, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2022-10-10, at 14:53, Elwyn Davies via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Elwyn Davies > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-13: (with COMMENT)

2022-10-20 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [OPSAWG] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-15

2022-05-30 Thread Lars Eggert
Dale, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2022-5-11, at 4:44, Dale Worley via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Dale Worley > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-17: (with COMMENT)

2022-05-30 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [OPSAWG] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09

2021-11-29 Thread Lars Eggert
Gyan, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-10-24, at 3:45, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: (with COMMENT)

2021-11-29 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-10: (with COMMENT)

2021-09-20 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: (with COMMENT)

2021-09-20 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [OPSAWG] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-09

2021-04-14 Thread Lars Eggert
Mohit, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-3-20, at 12:24, Mohit Sethi via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Mohit Sethi > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team