Hi Tianran,
Thanks for mentioning three standardized protocols that contribute to
world diversity: ISIS, OSPF and IPFIX.
Paolo
On 12/1/23 03:41, Tianran Zhou wrote:
Hi Zhenqiang and Thomas,
Thanks very much for sharing your experience and the discussion in the
mailing list.
IMO,
Hi,
I support adoption of draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01 and
intend to validate and implement the data collection in pmacct.
Paolo
On 21/12/22 23:25, Tianran Zhou wrote:
Hi WG,
This mail starts a WG Adoption Call for
draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01.
Hi,
Speaking with my hat of software developer: I have implemented this in
the free open-source flow collector pmacct (*) as part of the IETF 115
hackathon and found no issues. I hence support WGLC of the document.
Paolo
(*) https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct
On 30/11/22 10:53, Joe Clarke
Hi,
Having read the draft, i believe the work is valuable and support its WG
adoption.
Paolo
On 18/8/22 17:14, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote:
Hello, WG. We’d like to begin a two week call for adoption of this
work. Even as an individual draft it has already received some reviews
and has
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Paolo
On 9/6/22 08:16, Tianran Zhou wrote:
Dear authors and contributors,
As part of the working group last call, please respond on-list as to
whether or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to
I have read the draft: nice work & i'd support publication of this document.
Paolo
On 8/6/21 02:55, Tianran Zhou wrote:
Hi WG,
The following draft is mainly to request some IPFIX IE allocations.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type/
Dear OPSAWG'ers,
As a believer in draft-claise-opsawg-service-assurance-yang (read also
co-author) and OPSAWG enthusiast, I do support the adoption of both
draft-claise-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture and
draft-claise-opsawg-service-assurance-yang.
Paolo
On 27/4/21 20:01, Henk
I find this document useful and support its adoption.
Paolo
On 24/03/2021 07:23, Tianran Zhou wrote:
Hi WG,
As discussed in the IETF110 meeting, we start a two weeks adoption call
on draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-07:
A bit late but i support this work for the increased visibility it
brings into IPFIX for the MPLS-SR data plane.
Paolo
On 13/08/2020 14:41, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote:
Hello, WG members. During the IETF 108 virtual meeting, we had Thomas present
this work. It has been reviewed by SPRING
Hi,
With the hat of the developer of a open-source / free IPFIX collector (*, **),
I would like to express two opposite concerns with regards to this draft -
loosely related to the very details of the draft itself.
One concern is that this looks a very isolated effort, ie. why communities and
10 matches
Mail list logo
