rds,
> > Jie
> >
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 12:03 AM
> >> To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF ; Stewart
> >> Bryant
> >> Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.
Hi, Stewart,
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:07 AM Stewart Bryant
wrote:
>
>
> On 30/11/2018 19:23, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
>
> This is Mirja's comment, but ...
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:12 AM Mirja Kühlewind
> wrote:
>
>> Mirja Kühlewind has ent
This is Mirja's comment, but ...
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:12 AM Mirja Kühlewind
wrote:
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addr
Hi, Eliot,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:43 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Responding to Spencer, Ben, and Alexy (in order).
>
> On 16.04.18 21:09, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
>
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the s
I haven't balloted yet, and this is EKR's ballot thread, but one point is
worth bringing up here ...
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Hi Eliot,
>
> Thanks for continuing the conversation. My question is how this fits into
> the system as a whole.
>
> ISTM that there are tw
And, to be clear on one point ...
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
> wrote:
> > Hi, Benoit,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Benoit Claise
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
Hi, Benoit,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Benoit Claise wrote:
> The way I see it, we're going to fix comments forever.
>
Right. But my concern was that the text that we're reading for an up/down
vote can change after we read it, so I should be tracking the proposed text
changes.
That doesn
This may not be my week, when it comes to comprehension. At least, I'm 0
for 2 so far today.
Are we still tuning text in this draft?
https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/iesg-ballots/ says that the
alternate balloting procedure is an up/down vote - we either agree to
publish, or agree to send a
Following up on an obscure point ...
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses include
Hi, Tom,
On Mar 24, 2015 2:39 PM, "Tom Taylor" wrote:
>
> This update has two small changes, constraining the size of the indexing
addresses in the address and port map tables to eliminate smilint warnings
about subidentifier counts.
>
> Absent comments, this is ready to publish. I'll fill out th
Hi, Tom,
On Jan 18, 2015 9:57 PM, "Tom Taylor" wrote:
>
> Several months' work, almost done. A couple of sections need work, as
indicated in the document, but there's lots to review including the
complete MIB module definition.
Tina was asking me about this draft - are you planning to have me se
Tom,
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
> the draft file name has not historically mattered for AD sponsored
> documents
> (unless the name is obscene :-) )
>
> Scott
>
> On Oct 19, 2014, at 8:28 PM, Tom Taylor wrote:
>
> > I have submitted the I-D that deprecates the orig
12 matches
Mail list logo
