> Why anyone would need BMP wrapper to monitor IGP ?
probably similar reasons that folk seem to need bgp-ls to get the
is-is/ospf databases. is-is and ospf have decades of complexity
layered on un-simple bases. so we seek yet another layer of gunk
through which to see them more 'simply.'
i wou
Why anyone would need BMP wrapper to monitor IGP ?
BGP has been recently polluted enough that it works just perfectly fine
without a new draft/rfc or single line of code change to act as IGP
monitoring protocol.
Just enable AFI 16388 / SAFI 71 as described in RFC7752 (possibly with
many additio
robin,
> It is not described clearly in the draft that reusing BMP is also a
> possible option for monitoring IGP. We will refine the draft.
if i could also use bmp for monitoring dns, smtp, and ntp, i could
stop using nagios!
i think what acee is trying to say is that "B" in BMP does not stan
Monday, July 02, 2018 9:24 PM
To: Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW)
; g...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt
Hi Yunan, Shunwan, and Zhenbin,
: [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt
Hi Yunan, Shunwan, and Zhenbin,
What are the advantages of inventing a new protocol over just using YANG
and NETCONF, RESTCONF, or gNMI?
[Robin] In the draft we simply mention the d
...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org;
l...@ietf.org; rt...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt
i am confused as why this is in grow. it's protocol.
randy
___
OPSAWG mailing
i am confused as why this is in grow. it's protocol.
randy
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt
Hi Yunan, Shunwan, and Zhenbin,
What are the advantages of inventing a new protocol over just using YANG
and NETCONF, RESTCONF, or gNMI?
[Robi
Dept. NW) ;
g...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt
Hi Yunan, Shunwan, and Zhenbin,
What are the advantages of inventing a new protocol over just using YANG and
NETCONF, RESTCONF, or gNMI?
[Robin] In
Hi Yunan, Shunwan, and Zhenbin,
What are the advantages of inventing a new protocol over just using YANG and
NETCONF, RESTCONF, or gNMI? Operators and vendors are doing this anyway. A
second alternative would be to listen passively in IS-IS (or OSPF for that
matter). Why would anyone want this
10 matches
Mail list logo
