randy, noting that the IETF has trouble with the geo-tagging of its
addresses does not seem to have ANYTHING to do with demonstrating how
widely used the geo-communities are.
If you want to make that case, make it. But don't bring up red herrings.
As you note, it is up to the WG, not to me, w
> Thus, again, you are not making a case for why the existing techniques
> which are easier to implement and deploy are not sufficie3nt for the
> problem.
correct. i, and a couple of other ops, are making the case that
communities are fairly widely used for tagging geo loc at varying
granularitie
Randy, I did suggest that one would update the offline data.
My point was that the draft claims taht extreme timliness is needed.
For IP block geolocation, timeliness on the order of a day (much shorter
than the several days before the IETF when the IETF block gets turned on
somewhere.)
Thus,
