Hi Paul,
I looked at this one below.
On 10/19/2023 11:02 PM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
3.2 Data Type Semantics:
- this is not an identifier. It seems be a new type consisting of
(type, count) tuples.
*/[Med] Will double check this one. /*
You are right that
Vyncke (evyncke)
; opsawg@ietf.org; Benoit Claise
Objet : RE: [IPFIX] Full or Truncated EHs RE: Some comments on
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh
Med, I reviewed the current draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.
1.1 "Specify how to automatically update the IANA IPFIX registry"
- is &quo
Med, I reviewed the current draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.
1.1 "Specify how to automatically update the IANA IPFIX registry"
- is "automatically" correct? I didn't see any mention of this later in the
draft.
1.2 "Support means to report the observed Experimental Identifiers (ExIDs) that
: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) ; BOUCADAIR
Mohamed INNOV/NET ; opsawg@ietf.org
Cc : ip...@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [IPFIX] Full or Truncated EHs RE: Some comments on
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh
Eric Vyncke wrote:
Adding a new IE to signal the issue, why not ? I usually do not like too much
having
Eric Vyncke wrote:
Adding a new IE to signal the issue, why not ? I usually do not like too much
having a ‘negative signalling’, i.e., the absence of an IE having an important
meaning.
+1
No meaning can be inferred from the absence of an IE, since existing exporters
and those which choose not
