Re: [OPSAWG] [Softwires] Comments on draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-05

2017-04-26 Thread t . petch
Farrer" Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:18 AM Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Softwires] Comments on draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-05 > Hi Tianran, > > Yes, we would like to have a consensus on the NAT YANG data model and proceed with its publication in opsawg. > > Cheers, > Med &

Re: [OPSAWG] [Softwires] Comments on draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-05

2017-04-26 Thread mohamed.boucadair
> À : Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil); opsawg@ietf.org > Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] [Softwires] Comments on draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-05 > > I am looking at the YANG tree. The overall structure of this module is > clear and simple. > In addition to the text improvement, what do you want to

Re: [OPSAWG] [Softwires] Comments on draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-05

2017-04-26 Thread Tianran Zhou
I am looking at the YANG tree. The overall structure of this module is clear and simple. In addition to the text improvement, what do you want to discuss and get consensus wrt the YANG data model? Regards, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On B