Hi Blake,
Thanks for the extra context. Generally, IETF has a high bar for what it will
accept as errata, particularly if it looks like it could have a high impact,
and particularly when the RFC in question is now so old, and I generally err on
the side of caution!
For me to mark this errata
Hi,
I would appreciate input from the authors, and SNMP experts on how they think
this errata should be processed please. I've looked at the appropriate
sections of the RFC, but it isn't clear to me whether this errata is valid or
not and I'm slightly nervous of making what could amount to
