Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2]

2021-10-13 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
rg; 'opsawg-chairs' > Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2] > > Hi Rob, > > Thank you very much for your second review! We have made all the > modifications you pointed out. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf/09/ > Please help to move i

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2]

2021-10-13 Thread Haoyu Song
: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 2:08 PM To: Haoyu Song ; draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; 'opsawg-chairs' Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2] Hi Haoyu, Thanks for applying the markups. I've given -08 another read through, and I think that there are still some

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2]

2021-10-12 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
e result of composing the properties offered by these main classes. Warning: Use a comma before 'but' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). Suggested change: "system, but" Thanks, Rob > -----Original Message- > From: Haoyu Song >

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2]

2021-10-08 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
c: opsawg@ietf.org; 'opsawg-chairs' > Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2] > > Hi Rob, > > We have updated the draft according to your review suggestions and > uploaded the -08 version. In the new revision we believe all your > suggestions/questions have been ad

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2]

2021-10-07 Thread Haoyu Song
%3Dreserved=0 -Original Message- From: Haoyu Song Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 9:14 AM To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2] Hi Rob, Thank you very much for the review! We'll update

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2]

2021-10-06 Thread Haoyu Song
-ntf-07 [2] Hi, Here is my belated AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07.txt. [Text file with comments attached in case this also gets truncated.] I would like to thank you for the effort that you have put into this document, and apologise for my long delay in reviewing it. Broadly, I

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2]

2021-10-06 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
/WDnVtM_vLm15X28OTEwI9Q6gfx0/ Regards, Rob -Original Message- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton) Sent: 06 October 2021 11:48 To: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2] Hi, Here is my belated AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07.txt. [Text

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07

2021-10-06 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Sorry, the IETF mail filters have truncated my email. I'll resend as HTML to see if that helps. Rob -Original Message- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton) Sent: 06 October 2021 11:35 To: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 Hi

[OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07

2021-10-06 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi, Here is my belated AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07.txt. I would like to thank you for the effort that you have put into this document, and apologise for my long delay in reviewing it. Broadly, I think that this is a good and useful framework, but in some of the latter parts