Hi Brian,
Apologies for the late response.
On 3/31/17 6:40 AM, Brian Weis (bew) wrote:
> I support advancing this document, and have the following minor comments.
>
> (1) Section 1.3. LLDP should be referenced at first use. The wording
> at the beginning of Section 11 is nice: "IEEE802.1AB Link L
Hi Kent,
Thanks very much for taking the time to review the draft. Based on your
review, unless the WG objects, I'll include some changes as discussed below.
On 4/7/17 3:37 AM, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> First off, I think that this is an interesting and useful idea.
> However, I hav
Hi,
First off, I think that this is an interesting and useful idea. However, I have
found some issues that I'd like to discuss.
First, I think that this draft unnecessarily conflates the MUD file itself with
mechanisms for how a device might identify its model type and/or where
its MUD file can
I support advancing this document, and have the following minor comments.
(1) Section 1.3. LLDP should be referenced at first use. The wording at the
beginning of Section 11 is nice: "IEEE802.1AB Link Layer Discovery Protocol
(LLDP) [IEEE8021AB]”.
(2) Section 1.4. An interesting policy example
I support the document.
Regards,
Thorsten
On 17 March 2017 at 03:17, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Dear OPSAWG,
>
> This is a notice to start a two-week OPSAWG WG last call for the document:
>
> Manufacturer Usage Description Specification
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud/
>
> P
Folks,
I support this document. I have the following concerns,
1) A MUD file attribute indicating the expected MUD URL emission method is of
security value.
Discussion:
Section 1.3 indicates "three means are defined to emit the MUD URL” which
including unsecured modes. This introduces the po
Dear OPSAWG,
This is a notice to start a two-week OPSAWG WG last call for the document:
Manufacturer Usage Description Specification
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud/
Please read the above draft and send any issues, comments, or corrections to
this mailing list.
Please ind
