No Objection on
draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-12: (with COMMENT)
I have revised the text to read:
Renegotiation of sessions is not supported as it is not supported by TLS 1.3.
If a future version of TLS supports renegotiation, this RFC should be updated
to indicate whether there are any additional
I have revised the text to read:
Renegotiation of sessions is not supported as it is not supported by TLS 1.3.
If a future version of TLS supports renegotiation, this RFC should be updated
to indicate whether there are any additional requirements related to its use.
Regards,
Ken Vaughn
Thanks for explanation.
In that section, the unsafe points of 0-RTT was called out and was enforces by
normative language. For the renegotiation it was not described that much,
whether it is a non- preferred feature for SNMP as a whole for whatever reason,
rather it is just that TLS1.3 does
Thank you for your comment, while it is an interesting question, I think the
wording is appropriate as is.
I believe the proper interpretation of this text is that renegotiation is not
supported for TLS 1.3 and we have not designed anything to allow for
renegotiation (i.e., for any version of
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
