Re: [OPSAWG] draft-vaughn-tlstm-update-01 (TLSTM Update to support TLS 1.3)

Hi - On 2021-10-21 1:28 PM, Kenneth Vaughn wrote: ... If I properly understand your suggestion, you are requesting that we make the new document a stand-alone document and the group could separately consider the retirement of RFC 6353 - perhaps on a separate timeline. ... That seems

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-vaughn-tlstm-update-01 (TLSTM Update to support TLS 1.3)

Randy, If I properly understand your suggestion, you are requesting that we make the new document a stand-alone document and the group could separately consider the retirement of RFC 6353 - perhaps on a separate timeline. If this is an accurate summary of your request, it is largely captured

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-vaughn-tlstm-update-01 (TLSTM Update to support TLS 1.3)

Hi - On 2021-10-20 8:38 PM, Kenneth Vaughn wrote: I would like to present https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vaughn-tlstm-update-01/ . This document is a proposal to update to RFC 6353 (TLS Transport Model for SNMP) to 

[OPSAWG] draft-vaughn-tlstm-update-01 (TLSTM Update to support TLS 1.3)

I would like to present https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vaughn-tlstm-update-01/ . This document is a proposal to update to RFC 6353 (TLS Transport Model for SNMP) to reflect the needs of TLS 1.3. As a little bit of