> We would really appreciate any feedback on this document. Personally I
> think it is really useful, but we need the WG to review and provide
> feedback.
I have read this draft and support publication.
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash)
> wrote:
> >
On Nov 12, 2015, at 8:26 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Guy Harris wrote:
>
>> I don't see what the problem is with different block types having
>> different option name spaces. Common code to handle options in all
>> block types wouldn't be that