Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

I have reviewed the new version. Thanks for incorporating my comments. I have two substantive comment and a bunch of editorial suggestions. LMK if you would like me to put this in the tracker. SUBSTANTIVE for attack traffic, meeting regulatory requirements, or for other purposes. The

Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:12 AM Eric Rescorla wrote: > Hi Warren, > > I am on travel today, but I expect to read this today or Friday. Can you > give me until Saturday? > Sure. W > Thanks, > -Ekr > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: >

Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Warren, I am on travel today, but I expect to read this today or Friday. Can you give me until Saturday? Thanks, -Ekr On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > EKR, > I'm planning on clicking the "This document is approved" button before > the IETF101

Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

EKR, I'm planning on clicking the "This document is approved" button before the IETF101 meeting unless I hear a clear signal that there is something that you *cannot* live with. Thank you again for your Abstain and all of your comments on the document, W On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Warren