Hi Randy,
Since BMP is promoted in GROW WG, the work has much similarity with BMP. So we
applied for the presentation here.
Best Regards,
Robin
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2018 2:46 AM
To: Acee Lindem (acee)
Cc: Lizhenbin ;
Hi Bo,
My comments: (ignoring simple typos and placeholder values as this is a first
draft)
* What is a TACACS+ template? To my knowledge this is not a standard concept.
The word "template" does not appear in draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-10.
* What is a domain name, in the context of usernames?
Robin,
Pretty much same comment as Acee - I'm not clear as to why...
Protocol YANG models developed in the last years clearly provide much better
and more scalable approach to what has been proposed in the draft, since we are
talking is-is - look at notifications in
Dear OPSAWG chairs,
I'm writing to request a slot to present the updates of the following document.
Thank you very much!
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-ntf-02
Best regards,
Haoyu
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
i am confused as why this is in grow. it's protocol.
randy
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Hi Robin,
I'm not arguing to deprecate BMP. What I am arguing is that the fact that BMP
was created 15 years ago doesn't necessarily mean we should create an analogous
IMP for IS-IS given the current IETF OPS technologies and the fact that faster
link speeds and Moore's law facilitate
Dear Joe Clarke,
The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request.
opsawg Session 1 (2:00 requested)
Tuesday, 17 July 2018, Afternoon Session II 1550-1820
Room Name: Laurier size: 250
Hi Acee,
Thank for your attention to the new draft. Please refer to my reply inline.
Best Regards,
Robin
-Original Message-
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 9:24 PM
To: Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research
Hi there,
I have some quick comments on this draft:
1. There is a typo in section 1
“Another factor which drive this work is that tThe network
architectures are rapidly changing with the migration toward private
and public clouds.”
tThe->the
2. In section 1, you have
"A series of use cases
