On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 2:52 AM Randy Bush wrote:
>
> we have pushed draft-ymbk-opsawg-9092-update-01, see
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ymbk-opsawg-9092-update/
> and asked to have a few minutes for it on the agenda next month.
>
> as the document says
>
> Changes from [RFC9092]
we have pushed draft-ymbk-opsawg-9092-update-01, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ymbk-opsawg-9092-update/
and asked to have a few minutes for it on the agenda next month.
as the document says
Changes from [RFC9092] include the following:
* It is no longer assumed that a geofeed
Hi Tianran,
As part of the development of draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest we have
been elaborating a proposal for verifying the provenance of YANG data. After
some discussion among the authors, we believe it would be better to have it as
a separate draft, as there are many potential
OK. It’s clear.
Tianran
Sent from WeLink
发件人： Benoit
Claisemailto:benoit.claise=40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org>>
收件人： Tianran
Zhoumailto:zhoutianran=40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org>>;Benoit
Hi Tiaran,
You are right. My bad. draft-quilbeuf-opsawg-configuration-tracing is
for NETCONF.
draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest is OPSAWG
Regards, Benoit
On 6/27/2023 3:10 AM, Tianran Zhou wrote:
Hi Benoit,
It's on my list.
On draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest and
