[OPSAWG] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-11

2024-04-20 Thread Wesley Eddy via Datatracker
Reviewer: Wesley Eddy
Review result: Ready

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-...@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.


Thank you for responding to my prior review comments; the latest copy looks 
fine to me.


___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg


Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

2024-04-20 Thread LUIS ANGEL MUÑOZ , Vodafone
Hi Joe and all

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts

Regards
Luis



C2 General
De: OPSAWG  En nombre de Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Enviado el: viernes, 19 de abril de 2024 16:32
Para: opsawg@ietf.org
Asunto: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

CAUTION : This email originated outside the company. Do not click on any links 
or open attachments unless you are expecting them from the sender.
ATTENTION : Cet e-mail provient de l'extérieur de l'entreprise. Ne cliquez pas 
sur les liens ou n'ouvrez pas les pièces jointes à moins de connaitre 
l'expéditeur.

We're up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg