Hi,
I (as coauthor) support the publication of this document.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 11:07 AM
> To: opsawg@ietf.org
> Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject:
Hi Joel,
Thanks for your review comments. Please see my replies inline:
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 1:27 AM
> To: gen-...@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
>
Hi Jeff,
Thanks a lot for your comments and recommendation, which will be reflected in
next revision of this document.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:jh...@pfrc.org]
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 11:51 PM
> To: Dongjie (J
I'm not aware of any IPR related to this document.
-Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dongjie (Jimmy)
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 3:01 PM
> To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutian...@huawei.com>; opsawg@ietf.org
> Cc: o
Hi Joel,
Thanks a lot for your review comments.
Regarding your first problem, I don't think this draft introduces "significant
new processing load on the router", as similar processing has already been done
for the BGP AS number and BGP-nexthop based traffic collection. As described in
the
; Joel Halpern Direct
<jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.d...@huawei.com>;
gen-...@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community@ietf.org; opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04
Dear authors of dra
rn.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 11:19 PM
> To: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy)
> <jie.d...@huawei.com>; gen-...@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community@ietf.org; opsawg
> <opsawg@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: Genart e
Hi Spencer, Stewart, Joel,
Thanks for the discussion about the congestion adaptation. We agree the
reactive congestion adaptation may need further investigation.
Thus in order to solve Mirja's comment, we plan to make that example more
generic with something like:
"For example, the
Hi Mirja,
Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
How about we replace that sentence with something like:
"For example, the collected information could be used for traffic monitoring,
and could optionally be used for traffic optimization according to operator's
policy."
Best regards,
Hi Joel,
Thanks for your review.
We will replace the references in abstract with text in next version.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 4:38 AM
> To: gen-...@ietf.org
> Cc:
Hi Alissa,
Thanks for your review and comments.
We will correct the improper normative language in section 7 in next version.
As for the security considerations, we will discuss among coauthors and come
back to you.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: Alissa Cooper
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review and comments.
We will fix the boilerplate in next version.
As for the security considerations, we will discuss among coauthors and come
back to you.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
> Sent:
12 matches
Mail list logo
