Re: [OPSAWG] Network Telemetry Framework - new updates and request for adoption

2019-03-08 Thread Tianran Zhou
Hi Tom, Here comes the clue :-) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ntf/ Cheers, Tianran -邮件原件- 发件人: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] 发送时间: 2019年3月8日 20:00 收件人: Haoyu song ; opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org 主题: Re: [OPSAWG] Network Telemetry Framework - new

Re: [OPSAWG] Network Telemetry Framework - new updates and request for adoption

2019-03-08 Thread tom petch
- Original Message - From: "Haoyu song" Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2019 5:31 PM Dear OPSAWG members, We have update the Network Telemetry Framework draft significantly in the latest revision to address the issues and concerns raised in previous meetings and supplement some new material.

[OPSAWG] Network Telemetry Framework - new updates and request for adoption

2019-03-07 Thread Haoyu song
Dear OPSAWG members, We have update the Network Telemetry Framework draft significantly in the latest revision to address the issues and concerns raised in previous meetings and supplement some new material. The major updates are: 1. To address the concern that some techniques might go ob

Re: [OPSAWG] network telemetry framework

2018-04-02 Thread Haoyu song
Haoyu -Original Message- From: Joe Clarke [mailto:jcla...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2018 11:52 AM To: Haoyu song ; opsawg Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] network telemetry framework On 3/21/18 04:01, Haoyu song wrote: > Dear all, > >   > > The WG presentation triggered a lot

Re: [OPSAWG] network telemetry framework

2018-04-02 Thread Joe Clarke
On 3/21/18 04:01, Haoyu song wrote: > Dear all, > >   > > The WG presentation triggered a lot warm discussions on this topic. > > While we agree that at present it’s too aggressive to try to unify the > telemetry protocols, we feel it is needed to formalize the terminologies > and clarify the te

[OPSAWG] network telemetry framework

2018-03-21 Thread Haoyu song
Dear all, The WG presentation triggered a lot warm discussions on this topic. While we agree that at present it's too aggressive to try to unify the telemetry protocols, we feel it is needed to formalize the terminologies and clarify the technique classifications from multiple dimensions so to e