Re: [OPSAWG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, Thanks again for the comments, responses and proposals are inline. On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Adam, please see two further suggestions, in-line: > -Original Message- > From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 9:22 AM > To: Adam Roach > Cc: The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul Hoffman; draft-mm-wg- >

Re: [OPSAWG] Deborah Brungard's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Deborah, On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Deborah Brungard wrote: > Deborah Brungard has entered the following ballot position for > draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included

[OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Not Ready This is an early gen-art review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-04. The document is clear about what it is trying to do, and readable. It is not clear about how it expects this to actually work. However, I find the underlying concept confusing. 1)

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

> -Original Message- > From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com] > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM > To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul > Hoffman; draft-mm-wg-effect-encr...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Adam Roach's No

[OPSAWG] New Version Notification - draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-18.txt

A new version (-18) has been submitted for draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-18.txt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt/ Diff from previous version:

Re: [OPSAWG] Deborah Brungard's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Kathleen, Much better And as we discussed, not all these procedures are used by *all* operators, already there are other tools available/in development. I've slightly tweaked the following to hopefully clarify: As stated in RFC7258, "an appropriate balance (between network management and

Re: [OPSAWG] Deborah Brungard's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Deborah. Sent from my mobile device > On Feb 9, 2018, at 3:53 PM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A wrote: > > Hi Kathleen, > > Much better > > And as we discussed, not all these procedures are used by *all* operators, > already there are other tools available/in development. I've

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

I just posted a new version based on the discussion prior to this and will update according to any follow ups from this or other edits. The update only includes the comments responded to so far, more to come. Thank you, Kathleen Sent from my mobile device > On Feb 9, 2018, at 3:34 PM, Adam

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:31 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM >> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) >> Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari;

Re: [OPSAWG] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, Now back to your comments. Thanks again for your assistance with recommendations to reshape section 2 and other sections. On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Mirja Kühlewind

Re: [OPSAWG] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alexey, Thanks again for your comments. Responses inline. On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Alexey Melnikov > wrote: >> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Adam, Thanks for the additional comments. We'll discuss in line and make updates as appropriate. On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:00 PM, Adam Roach wrote: > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection > > When responding,