Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Not Ready
This is an early gen-art review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-04.
The document is clear about what it is trying to do, and readable. It is not
clear about how it expects this to actually work.
However, I find the underlying concept confusing.
1
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Not Ready
This is both a gen-art re-review and a routing directorate requested review.
The revisions from draft-04 to -06 show some improvement. However, I still
have serious problems with this work.
The primary problem is that this seems to violate
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
cell
kvau...@trevilon.com
www.trevilon.com <http://www.trevilon.com/>
On Feb 9, 2023, at 6:56 PM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker
wrote:
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF
I would add that the text about processing such things seems to me to be
the typical (and appropriate) use of the Postel Principle, from which we
can tell that the important part is the rule earlier in the text that
says that EHs occur once each, except for destination options which may
occur
I checked with the IETF's liaison manager for ITU-T. It turns out,
process-wise, that the underlying document this refers to was fully
approved by ITU-T in December. So there is nothing to respond to and
no benefit for the IETF in generating a response.
Yours,
Joel
On 2/17/2024 12:13 AM,
nd what behavior is expected of the router (not just
"the same
> as that over there.")
> Yours,
> Joel
> On 2/11/18 1:32 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > Thanks for your review com
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
10 matches
Mail list logo
