Thanks for your review, Meral,
we'll make these changes in -14.
regards,
Al
From: Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 7:54 PM
To: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt@ietf.org; gen-...@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of
Thanks Meral, we'll make these edits in the
working version.
Kathleen and Al
From: Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 8:32 PM
To: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt@ietf.org; gen-...@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART Telechat Call review of
Adam, please see two further suggestions, in-line:
> -Original Message-
> From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 9:22 AM
> To: Adam Roach
> Cc: The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul Hoffman; draft-mm-wg-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul
> Hoffman; draft-mm-wg-effect-encr...@ietf.org
> Subj
Hi Ian, Gorry and Colin,
please see a few hard-earned comments below, marked [acm],
Al
From: ippm [mailto:ippm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ian Swett
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2019 8:48 PM
To: Gorry Fairhurst
Cc: q...@ietf.org; ts...@ietf.org; IETF IPPM WG (i...@ietf.org)
; Peter Gutmann
Hi OPSAWG, and IPPM WG,
The adoption call for this draft is somewhat
controversial, so I looked into a few details and
background discussions, especially the e-mail thread
for the call for adoption and the draft itself.
I have read messages expressing concern over the scope of this
work, and
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E
> Carpenter
...
> tom petch wrote:
> > That is why i would like to see if there is a form of adopting this
> > document under
> > specific premises / constraints for acceptable changes
>
>
