Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-06 Thread Tim Chown
Hi, > On 6 Feb 2018, at 10:13, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > > Re-, > > Please see inline. > > Cheers, > Med > >> -----Message d'origine- >> De : Tim Chown [mailto:tim.ch...@jisc.ac.uk] >> Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2018 10:38

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-06 Thread Tim Chown
Hi Med, > On 6 Feb 2018, at 09:02, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > Thank you for the review. > > Please see inline. > > Cheers, > Med > >> -Message d'origine- >> De : Tim Chown [mailto:tim.ch...@jisc.ac.uk] >

[OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-05 Thread Tim Chown
Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Has Nits I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-22 Thread Tim Chown
hough: Should it be >>>> published (1) as draft-ietf-ospawg-* given that its content was part of the >>>> document that was accepted by the WG and that passed the WGLC or (2) as an >>>> individual document that will be handed to the AD together with >>>> d