Re: [OPSAWG] Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-10: (with COMMENT)

2024-02-11 Thread Erik Kline
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 9:41 AM Randy Bush wrote: > > thanks erik, > > > * "... processing is too hard." > > > > Perhaps there's a better wording that might be found here. "imposes > > significant computational complexity" or something? > > how about > > processing would be quite complex

Re: [OPSAWG] Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-10: (with COMMENT)

2024-02-11 Thread Randy Bush
thanks erik, > * "... processing is too hard." > > Perhaps there's a better wording that might be found here. "imposes > significant computational complexity" or something? how about processing would be quite complex and error prone randy

[OPSAWG] Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-10: (with COMMENT)

2024-02-10 Thread Erik Kline via Datatracker
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-10: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to