Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

2018-03-02 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
; Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.d...@huawei.com>; gen-...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community@ietf.org; opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: Re: Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04 Dear authors of dra

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

2018-03-01 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
gets the AS information. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Zhenqiang Li > > > > > > > > li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com > > > >

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

2018-03-01 Thread Randy Bush
> Let me try to explain it clearly in simple words again. BGP community > attributes, such as standard community, extended community, large > community, have already been defined by IDR working group. Operaters > use those already defined BGP communities in their field networks with > their own

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

2018-03-01 Thread Ignas Bagdonas
lto:opsawg@ietf.org> *Subject:* Re: Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04 I am having trouble reconciling two of your comments. In you rlast email you said that this is for "planed communities represent the groups of customers peers an geo

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

2018-02-28 Thread Joel Halpern Direct
ommunity@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community@ietf.org>; opsawg <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> *Subject:* Re: Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04 Is this for one operator (still important, but not necessarily for

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

2018-02-27 Thread Joel M. Halpern
ietf.org>; opsawg@ietf.org <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> *Subject:* Re: Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04 This was a requested early review.  You folks can do as you deem best. From where I sit, it seems odd.  Most well-known communities

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

2018-02-11 Thread Joel M. Halpern
ebruary 10, 2018 1:27 AM To: gen-...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org Subject: Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04 Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Not Ready This is an early gen-art review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ip

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

2018-02-10 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04 > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Not Ready > > This is an early gen-art review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-04. > > The document is clear about what it is trying to do,

[OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

2018-02-09 Thread Joel Halpern
Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Not Ready This is an early gen-art review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-04. The document is clear about what it is trying to do, and readable. It is not clear about how it expects this to actually work. However, I find the underlying concept confusing. 1)