Re: [OPSAWG] Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-10: (with COMMENT)

[Erik Kline]

On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 9:41 AM Randy Bush  wrote:
>
> thanks erik,
>
> > * "... processing is too hard."
> >
> >   Perhaps there's a better wording that might be found here.  "imposes
> >   significant computational complexity" or something?
>
> how about
>
> processing would be quite complex and error prone
>
> randy
>

sounds good to me, thanks!

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-10: (with COMMENT)

[Randy Bush]

thanks erik,

> * "... processing is too hard."
> 
>   Perhaps there's a better wording that might be found here.  "imposes
>   significant computational complexity" or something?

how about

processing would be quite complex and error prone

randy

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg